Pit bulls: vicious or victims?
The Daily Progress/Andrew Shurtleff
Sara Meehan (right), who leads the nonprofit Misunderstood Pit Bull Rescue, introduces pit bulls to Daniel Harris and Erin Gran during a pit bull adoption day held at the Charlottesville-Albemarle SPCA.
Sara Meehan has seen the reports of pit bull attacks and calls in some areas for pit bull bans.
She thinks the breed has gotten a bad rap.
“They’re great family pets,” she says. “I have never had a problem.”
She backs up her talk with action. Meehan operates the nonprofit Misunderstood Pit Bull Rescue, which takes in “ambassadors” of the breed from shelters and adopts them out. And, the single mother with a 1-year-old son currently shares her Richmond home with 13 pit bulls. Three of them are hers; the others are orphans, several of them puppies from a recent litter.
Meehan brings orphan pit bulls to the Charlottesville-Albemarle SPCA every third Sunday in an effort to put them into good homes. She also conducts a “parenting” class for owners of pit bulls. Recent attendance has petered out, though, she says.
And that’s not good, she says, as she and others believe the problem is not with pit bulls, or any other particular breed of dog, but with the owners and the public’s perception.
“Our dogs obviously have a bad name,” she says. But “they’re just like any other dog; it’s just them being in the wrong hands. … What we think is crucial to changing the image is educating owners on how to be responsible pit bull owners.”
Albemarle Sgt. Pete Mainzer, who oversees the police department’s animal control office, agrees with Meehan.
“Is there any correlation between dog attacks and a particular breed? We have not been able to show that,” he says. “We tend to think that the pit bulls do get a bad rap. A lot of what happens is because of the owner. … Any dog can be aggressive if you don’t treat it properly.”
Meehan wants to bring the pit bull back to what she says is its rightful place as a beloved American pet. In the early days of this country, she says pit bulls were used to herd cattle and kept as “nanny dogs,” because they could withstand the poking and prodding of children. She says pit bulls were even put on posters touting them as America’s dogs.
“Now, when people look at them, they’re scared,” she says.
Her quest to repair the pit bull name is a tall order.
The city of Denver has a pit bull ban, for instance. Locally, statewide and nationally their reputation as vicious dogs has snowballed in recent years, and the Michael Vick dog-fighting saga took it to a new level. Other incidents have taken a toll, too.
In the Charlottesville area there have been incidents involving pit bulls. In February 2007, two pit bulls attacked and seriously injured a Charlottesville woman as she walked along a Nelson County road. The owner of the dogs, Eric F. Johnson, pleaded guilty to a felony and was sentenced to six months in jail. He also was ordered to pay $8,400 in medical expenses and faces a $1 million lawsuit. In May, an elderly woman’s Pomeranian was killed by what witnesses said was a pit bull in the Woodlake neighborhood in Albemarle. The attacking dog could not be identified, so no charges were filed, said Mainzer.
After three pit bulls killed an elderly Spotsylvania County woman and her dog in 2005, legislators passed a vicious dog bill, which significantly increased punishment for owners of dogs that attack people. The state also has created a dangerous dog registry. Currently there are only three dogs listed on the registry in the Charlottesville area — all of them are pit bulls.
Perhaps most damning is an extensive list compiled by Merritt Clifton of Animal People, an anti-animal cruelty publication in Clinton, Wash. In his list, which used media accounts of dog attacks in the United States from 1982 to 2006, pit bulls were the culprits in more than half of the 2,209 incidents, at 1,110. Rottweilers were a distant second, at 409 attacks.
Meehan says media coverage, misidentification of attacking dogs and skewed bite reports have played a role in how pit bulls are seen.
She points out a Web site (http://www.atts.org) that lists dog breed temperament from specific testing, and pit bulls passed at an 84.3 percent clip, better than Chihuahuas (70.3 percent), Jack Russell terriers (82.1 percent) and miniature poodles (76.6 percent).
While pit bulls obviously can do much more damage than any of those smaller dogs, Meehan believes many attacks or bites by other dog breeds aren’t reported, whereas a pit bull bite will garner a report every time.
On top of that, she and Mainzer think a small portion of pit bull owners, who raise them to be vicious, give the majority a bad name.
The bad dog owners are similar to a saying in law enforcement, Mainzer says: “Ninety percent of crime is committed by 10 percent of the people.”
Meehan hopes her work will change perception and reality. So far she has adopted out 103 pit bulls, all of which she and other volunteers “temperament test.” But she has some extra pit bulls at home she’d like to move.
The next local SPCA pit bull adoption event and class is scheduled for 1 to 4 p.m. July 20.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Misidentification?
Can you identify the Pit Bull?
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthebull/findpitbull_v4.swf
The Media-A reliable source for dog bite info?
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/media1.asp
For factual info on the dogs known as “Pit Bulls” please check out
http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org/section.php?id=5
and
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/default.asp
VA Stats
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/VirginiaStats.asp
Over the past 43 years (1965 - 2007) there have been eleven (11) fatal dog attacks in Virginia, or approximately one (1) fatality every four (4) years.
At least FIVE (5) DIFFERENT BREEDS/TYPES of dogs have been identified as participating in a fatal attack in Virginia.
Pit Bulls are
K9 Narcotics & Explosives Detection Dogs
http://www.lawdogsusa.org/lawdogs.html
SAR Dogs
http://www.forpitssake.org/sar.html
Therapy Dogs with kids and the Elderly
http://www.forpitssake.org/therapy.html
Therapy dogs with Cancer Patients and troubled Youths
“Dr Leo”-Rescued from Michael Vick now a certified Therapy Dog
http://www.ourpack.org/
Service Dogs
http://www.chloethepitbull.com/
National Champions
Wallace the Pit Bull
2007 Purina IDC National Champ
http://wallacethepitbull.com/
Pit Bulls with titles
CGC,TDI,Agility,ATTS
http://www.badrap.org/rescue/hall_of_fame.cfm
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/DogSurvey.htm
It`s time to stop blaming the dogs
Millions of these dogs are beloved family pets in responsible homes.
http://server.inalbum.com/show/jodipreis/Message_to_the_Media2.html?296033009
Time to target the Abusers and the irresponsible owners who are destroying the reputation of these dogs.
http://web.mac.com/animalsite/iWeb/PSA/spot.html
AVMA-Community Dog Bite Prevention
http://www.avma.org/public_health/dogbite/dogbite.pdf
Perhaps most damning is an extensive list compiled by Merritt Clifton of Animal People,...
Merritt Clifton`s “study”????
Hmm
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dogbites1.asp
Junk “Science” - Merritt Clifton’s (Animal People)
Mr. Clifton’s “study” can be found on a prominent dog-bite attorney website and is being used as “statistical evidence” of breed behaviors by those who seem unable or unwilling to recognize the critical errors in data collection and the damaging and erroneous conclusions drawn from a biased and flawed sample.
An Analysis of Merritt Clifton (Animal People)
Dog Attack Deaths and Maimings, U.S. & Canada - September 1982 to November 13, 2006.
Merritt Clifton’s scrapbook of newspaper articles is presented, and often accepted, as an unbiased and accurate representation of dog attacks in the U.S. and Canada. The title and numbers presented as “statistics” suggest that an unbiased, scientific methodology was used to achieve the results.
However, Mr. Clifton arbitrarily excluded dog attacks in which the breed of dog was not “identifiable,” that is, where no one at the scene, or later, claimed to know what kind of dogs were involved. Also excluded were dogs deemed to be used for guarding, police work or as fighting dogs. The uncertainty of any alleged breed identification aside, the exclusion of all attacks by dogs where no breed identification was asserted, combined with the exclusion of dogs used for a specific function, leaves us a list that is utterly unrepresentative of “dog attacks and maimings” in the U.S. and Canada.
Mr. Clifton’s “study” further suffers from the use of a biased sample. There is no national organization in the U.S. or Canada that collects data on a systematic basis on the circumstances or specifics of dog bite-related injuries. In the absence of a professionally reliable data source, news reports are often substituted in an attempt to identify circumstances surrounding dog attacks. However, newspapers do not have the interest, desire, resources or ability to provide an accurate or complete profile of dog attacks occurring in the U.S. and Canada.
Newspaper articles as a biased sample:
Fatal Dog Attack Numbers:
Merritt Clifton located 264 fatal dog attacks in the U.S. and Canada from 1982 to 2006 through the collection of newspaper articles.
The Centers for Disease Control and the National Canine Research Council have documented 477 fatal dog attacks in the U.S. and Canada during this same period.
“Maiming” Numbers:
Merritt Clifton located 2,209 “attacks doing bodily harm” occurring between 1982 and 2006 from newspaper articles.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control over 300,000 people report annually to emergency rooms for treatment of dog bites, of whom approximately 6,000 are injured severely enough to require hospitalization.
Hospital admission for injuries sustained during a dog attack is a valid medical assessment of “bodily harm.” Therefore, according to the CDC and the NCIPC, at least 150,000 people received bodily harm (i.e., hospital admission with a median stay of 3.6 days) from dog attacks during the same time period as Clifton’s “study.“ (1982-2006)
Merritt Clifton’s collection of the 2,209 attacks reported in the newspapers is clear evidence that most “attacks doing bodily harm” are NOT reported.
What method editors and reporters use to determine which dog attacks to publicize is unknown.
Clifton then went on to draw sweeping and totally inaccurate conclusions about breed behaviors; presenting his collection of newspaper articles as “evidence” and “predictive” of the nature and behavior of all the other dogs in the U.S.
More on Clifton`s “study”
http://lassiegethelp.blogspot.com/2007/08/dangerous-breeds-dog-bite-statistics.html
http://lassiegethelp.blogspot.com/2007/08/pit-bulls-dog-bite-statistics-and.html
http://lassiegethelp.blogspot.com/2008/01/nitwit.html


Advertisement