Publicist files defamation suit against The Hook

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

A Hollywood publicist based in Buckingham County has filed a defamation suit against the parent company of The Hook and two of the publication’s reporters.

Thomas L. Garrett Jr. filed the suit Monday morning in Buckingham Circuit Court against Better Publications LLC, Lindsay Barnes and Courteney Stuart. Garrett is seeking $5 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages for each of two claims of defamation.

Hawes Spencer, editor and publisher of The Hook, said Monday afternoon that he was not aware a lawsuit had been filed. Spencer said the paper denies the charges and stands behind its reporters.

“… This lawsuit comes as no surprise,” Spencer said.

Garrett’s lawyer, the Daleville-based James R. Creekmore, said Monday that his client felt the lawsuit was long overdue.

“They have followed a pervasive pattern of attacking Mr. Garrett,” Creekmore said. “It was severe enough that he couldn’t overlook it any longer.”

According to the complaint, the first claim of defamation against all three defendants relates to the alternative newsweekly’s coverage of forgery charges filed against Garrett in Buckingham. The complaint claims that Barnes “lampoons Garrett and his attorney over one matter or another” with stories about Garrett’s court case and existence of a magazine cover story on Garrett.

The suit’s second count of defamation, which is only against Better Publications and Stuart, claims Stuart’s April 24 article on Garrett’s plea deal made false statements about the facts of the case.

According to court records, Garrett was charged in January 2006 with 15 counts of forgery and uttering. Garrett pleaded guilty to entering the property of another for the purpose of damaging it, court records show, and received a 12-month suspended sentence and two years of unsupervised probation. The commonwealth’s attorney chose not to prosecute the remaining forgery and uttering charges.

In the suit, Garrett claims that defamation by The Hook and its reporters caused him to lose his position with an Australian radio program, damaged his relationship with a Christian academy in Buckingham and prevented him from renting an apartment in California.

Advertisement

 
View More: the hook,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by SouthernX on December 23, 2008 at 10:09 pm

That’s funny Good Neighbor. You’ve done a prodigious job of proving ‘why’ there needs to be a lawsuit. You believed what those reporters wrote because you don’t actually know any better.  It’s also a sad reflection of your cognitive skills in that you seem to miss the fact that Garrett is a local. He’s not ‘from’ LA. If you send him BACK to where he comes from, you might see him more often than you do now. Careful what you wish for.
Did you really go to all the trouble of registering, just to make that comment? How amusing.

Flag Comment Posted by Good Neighbor on December 23, 2008 at 10:58 am

Hopefully, The Hook will file a counter suit for their legal costs. If the guy was writing bad checks before, wait till he has to pay legal costs for having to defend against this ridiculous suit. Run the guy out of town and back to Hollywood.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Special Reports
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement