County considers teacher merit pay
Albemarle County school officials are trying to answer a question often asked: Should better teachers be paid more?
Considering an expansion of the school division’s current model — where pay is based almost exclusively on teachers’ seniority and degrees — the School Board discussed on Thursday a model allowing good teachers to make more money.
“I think some board members believe we have a compensation model that’s out of step with our strategic goals,” board Chairman Brian Wheeler said. “Pay for contribution means investing more in teachers who are contributing the most to student learning.”
An eight-person task force, which has met twice since it was formed in May, has explored numerous models that would allow teachers to earn compensation that exceeds their base salaries.
Some models would give teachers bonus pay for gains in student learning, while others would grant bonuses for teaching in high-poverty schools or in subject areas that are hard to staff. Other incentives could include additional pay for having specific skills or knowledge, or for serving in advanced teaching roles.
The task force hopes to help answer an essential question: What’s the most fair way to judge how teachers are contributing to student learning?
“You have to be able to measure performance. That is the difficult part,” said task force member Lorna Gerome, Albemarle assistant director of human resources.
Teachers have expressed concern that compensation will be based strictly on student performance in Standards of Learning tests, according to school officials, who’ve batted down that possibility.
“Nobody is suggesting that pay for contribution would be based solely on test scores, because we know that won’t work,” Wheeler said. “You need to have multiple [measurements of contribution], or the teachers won’t buy into it.”
The county’s current scale is similar to many scales that schools throughout the country developed in the 1920s, designed to eliminate inequities based on factors such as gender and race, according to a staff report. The scale, which was objective and easy to administer, also encouraged teachers to pursue advanced degrees.
Steven Gissendanner, the president of the Albemarle Education Association, said that the school division is not pushing for a new compensation scale as part of next year’s budget, because it’s a long-term consideration that requires extensive research. If the schools do eventually adopt a contribution compensation scale, it likely will not happen for at least two budget cycles, said Gissendanner, a member of the task force.
The task force, which is continuing to research teacher pay models, plans to meet again in mid-October, Gerome said. If new compensation models are passed in the future, “stable, consistent funding is critical for success,” she said.
Bruce Benson, the division’s assistant superintendent of student learning, said that if schools decide to implement contribution pay scales, he recommends that the model first be studied on a small scale, as part of a pilot program.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I think we agree on a lot. Clearly, demographics play a big part in test scores. (The best predictor of SAT score, for example,is family income.) That’s why it’s rather short-sighted for politicians and others – the big business types [Chamber of Commerce, Business Rountable] to continually push standardized test scores as of “accountability.“
What is “world-class?“ Good question. Many teachers in the county system have wondered about that. From what I can gather, it means good test scores, more Advanced Placement courses and International Baccalaureate, and getting recognized through the Malcolm Baldridge Educational Excellence award criteria.
Spending? Percentage-wise, the money is not going to teachers.
D, I agree with some of what you mention. However, when the demographics represent an ‘affluent’ student body would you not expect higher results? If so, are we “world-class” (whatever that is) or just in the right place? If so, have we really accomplished alot? I am glad to see students excel don’t get me wrong.
My mention of accomplishing little refers not to the entire system but these targeted items which do little to enhance education as a whole but seem to incurr more cost.
As for Wall street’s problem? One word…GREED. Not democrate or repubs or Bush or any other excuse.
Money is a SHORT-term motivator, First Amendment. And it likely is not the best motivator. Nor is it an appropriate motivator when authentic learning is the issue. Implementing a system like that being discussed is complicated, complex and cumbersome. And it would probably impair morale.
As you must know, or perhaps refuse to believe, Albemarle county is an affluent county. But for teacher salary comparison purposes, it compares itself to less affluent localities like Augusta, Buckingham, Danville, Fluvanna, Madison, Nelson, Orange. etc. Then, when it collects salary comparison data, it counts it incorrectly. Yet county schools are perennial high-performers. The schools that have trouble making AYP are generally those with the lowest-income and most diverse student populations.
Your suggest that schools accomplish little. That is not the case. American public schools have their problems, but generally, they’ve been doing a very good job for a long time. The political polemic, A Nation at Risk, painted inaccurate potrait of public schooing and wrongly linked public schools to economic competitiveness. If public schools are so bad, as you suggest, then why do so many foreign natinal flock to our universities and why does the WOrld Economic Forum rate the U.S. number 1 in competitiveness?
Conservative ideas –– take your pick, No Child Left Behind, the Bush tax cuts and economic policy –– are on the wane? Doubt it? What do you think led to the prblems on Wall Street and in the credit markets?
Ok, so they want to spend more money to reward. Not a bad thing. Will they conversely reduce compensation or the leapfrog increases for those who under perform? If not, this is once again a reason for them to increase spending and accomplish little. Money is a shortterm motivator!


Advertisement