City pitches a solution
The Daily Progress/Kaylin Bowers
Charlottesville wants to team up with Habitat for Humanity and spend $10,000 so Pauline E. Mallard would have something to live in other than a tent on Angus Road. Her neighbors have complained for years about the appearance of her property.
For three decades, Pauline E. Mallard has lived intermittently in a series of campers, cars and tents on her Angus Road property, an unkempt anomaly among the rows of tidy ranch houses in this quiet neighborhood.
And for three decades those neighbors have pleaded with Charlottesville officials to do something — anything — to force Mallard to take better care of her overgrown property and clean up her ever-expanding collection of tote bags, gardening equipment and trash.
Now city officials think they have hit upon an innovative, if quirky, solution: They are going to spend $10,000 to buy Mallard a yurt.
The city would like to team up with the local Habitat for Humanity to purchase the portable, tent-like structure, with city funds, and a church group has agreed to set up the circular, wooden hut. If the plan goes through, Mallard would live like the nomads of the Central Asian steppes who have resided in yurts for thousands of years.
Using taxpayer money to stitch such a festering community wound is more than justified, officials say.
It is the humanitarian thing to do, they contend, for the wheelchair-bound Mal-lard, who is approaching 80. The yurt would provide more protection from the elements than Mallard’s blue and gray tent, which was donated by a church group. And the yurt would have electricity, a bathroom and indoor plumbing.
“It’s a difficult issue to balance her rights with the rights of the neighborhood, and we decided to see if we can partner with some folks to give her a place to live the rest of her days on her own land, and clean it up for the neighborhood,” said Jim Tolbert, the city’s head planner.
More room for trinkets
A relatively spacious yurt would give Mallard room to store her myriad trinkets inside, instead of having them spill out across her yard. That should placate neighbors who are fed up with staring at garbage bags and piles of trash.
“We are giving her a reprieve and, frankly, her neighbors a reprieve,” Mayor Dave Norris said. “It is going to be a significant improvement over what is there now.”
The city has not sat idly by during the 30 years since Mallard’s house partially burned down under mysterious circumstances. It has found her in violation of the state’s building code and, on another occasion, required her to remove two station wagons that she called home.
But a permanent fix has proved elusive, and caretaking visits by the city and an area church have done little to soothe neighbors’ anger and keep the site neat.
Councilors might debate the yurt proposal during their June 16 meeting. Tolbert has discussed the option with several neighbors and says that a social worker has pitched the idea to Mallard. Members of a local church and representatives of the PACEM organization, which operates a homeless shelter in the winter, said they have also talked with her about the yurt.
But when approached in her tent, Mallard said she was unaware of the yurt plan.
“I don’t mind talking about it, but this is the first I’ve heard of it,” she said. “I don’t feel I’m in a position to say something more right now.”
She declined to talk for publication about her living situation, relations with her neighbors or her past experience with the city.
Neighbors, however, were not so reticent. They say they are tired of having the equivalent of a miniature city dump on their street. And the many retirees who live on Angus Road fear it will be difficult to sell their houses for a proper value with Mallard’s property in such shambles.
“We’ve been asking the city to do something about the way it looked. Every time we look out of our window it is horrendous,” said Phyllis Birckhead, who lives with her mother across the street from Mallard.
The neighbors insist they wish Mallard no ill will and stress that she personally does not cause them any problems. Neighbors spoke of offering her water and food on hot days and letting her use their bathrooms.
The yurt proposal has gotten a mixed reaction along Angus Road, with several homeowners saying they want to reserve judgment until they get more information from the city.
“She needs a lot of help, but we don’t want a $10,000 shanty,” Birckhead said. “At her age she needs to be somewhere comfortable.”
34 years of complaints
The drama between Mallard and her neighbors dates back to 1974, when she got into an altercation with police officers and a neighbor while they were searching her house for the neighbor’s missing dog, according to newspaper accounts. She was convicted of misdemeanor assault and battery but filed a $200,000 lawsuit.
One of the officers countersued and, in 1978, obtained a court order to put her house on the auction block — with the proceeds going to pay off outstanding liens and the $22,500 in damages the court awarded the officer.
The day before the auction, the officer took out a fire insurance policy on the house. Then, six hours before the sale was to begin, it burned down. Mallard was charged with arson, but the case was eventually dismissed.
The house was condemned and torn down by the city in 1983, and Mallard began living in a wood-paneled Chevrolet station wagon, another station wagon and an old camper. The city’s building code board cited her in 1994 and made her clean up the property. More than two years later Charlottesville forced her to tow away the two station wagons.
At the beginning of this decade, Mallard moved into the Crescent Halls public housing complex. But the city condemned the unit she shared with her son in 2004 because it was infested with cockroaches and tainted with human and animal feces. Eventually she was given another unit in the building.
In recent years she has jumped around from rental properties to shelters, while continuing to sleep on her Angus Road lot for stretches of time. Last month a local church group gave her a new tent and helped clean the site.
But that still didn’t resolve the issue, and so some hope the yurt idea can end the neighborhood tensions.
“As we understand it, this is an idea in a preliminary stage of evaluation,” said Overton McGehee, executive director of Habitat for Humanity of Greater Charlottesville. “Habitat is interested in understanding the objectives of the city for this project and the desires of the neighborhood.”
The city is optimistic that Mallard will acquiesce to the yurt proposal and that a long-running saga can come to a congenial end.
Habitat would own the yurt and would be able to reuse it elsewhere at a later date.
“It’s a great idea, it’s not a lot of money and, hopefully, it will solve a problem,” Tolbert said.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I want to respond to these notes about these neighbors around the block. First, you say you know a few—do you know Mrs. Mallard or Mrs. Hamlin (as she is also known)? Do you actually know what these people have had to contend with for over 30 some years??? Do you live on the same street? Do you have to look out your front window into this mess daily or live on either side of this mess? And when your comment comes to GOD—does he also say do not judge lest you be judged? DID you know that these people have helped or tried to help? You must not know much about this situation—You did read what has occurred on that property, what she has been arrested for and what has been done to provide housing for this lady in the past—yet you think these people should just give their time and money to help someone who is not willing to help herself? Did you read thissssssss? Do you think these people want a $10,000 shanty put up in the middle of a high class neighborhood? Do you want her in your backyard? I did not hear you offer to have it put in your area? What good do you think it will do in no time she will have it back in the same shape! So take some of your own advice—“If you are not going to help”...then don’t be putting the good people of that neighborhood down.
The Council could better put that money to use by helping the HOPE house that was trying to help many homeless people get back on their feet.
Yes, you are right about the sons and they apparently (atleast one) has something to do with this YURT!
Of all the bone-headed ideas…!!! The Charlottesville City Government reminds me of an endless series of Monty Python skits. So here we have an individual who is (a) clearly not destitute or could obtain funds (she owns property) and (b) is continually in violation or at best at odds with assorted ordinances, and (c) is apparently in need of mental health care; and the solution is to spend $10,000 of city money to build her a YURT? Why should the city taxpayers bear this burden? As for this rationale: “A relatively spacious yurt would give Mallard room to store her myriad trinkets inside, instead of having them spill out across her yard” - am i the only one ROTFLMAO? Does anyone really believe that her shiny new yurt will not also become an eyesore stuffed with trinkets in a very short period of time? I am absolutely amazed by the bizarre ideas I hear coming out of Charlottesville government. Here’s my solution; comdemn this property, sell it at auction, use the proceeds to pay for this individual’s long-term care, and throw the rest into keeping the homeless shelter open. As for her long term care, maybe we could permanently relocate her in one of our sister cities, someplace with yurts. Any better ideas Mayor Norris?
DarnBilly-This woman has sons.Don’t count on the City being willed this property.They are obviously not present now but will show up when the will is read.
It baffles me that the city would approve and fund a solution that cannot possibly be legal. Yurts are not approved forms of single family housing. I doubt that it has running water or toilets. How can the Mayor and the Director of Neighborhood Development even consider this idea when it doesn’t meet city zoning regulations? I wonder if this will set a precedent that will result in more yurts elsewhere in the city. Bums and drunks camp out in various parts of town. Will the city start putting up yurts at their encampments?
Wallace&Grommit;- good call on my angry tone. Guilty as charged. I’m afraid that comes from over 20 years witnessing the City of Charlottesville waste our money. I hope it didn’t seem like my ire is directed at the woman in this predicament, because she clearly needs assistance. I just don’t think it makes a lick of sense for the taxpaying segment of Charlottesville’s citizenry to bear that burden.
Option A � UVA 5th Floor, while more sympathetic I could not be, Ms Mallard seems to, just perhaps, have mental issues.
Option B � no tax funding, Darwinism should work things out with time (harsh I know, but freedom increases responsibility)
Option C � A bus ticket, a bulldozer, and 5 grand. Give her 5k & a bus ticket. Do a quick claim deed to the city, level the property. Call it Mallard Park.
Option D � I�m so glad I don�t live in the city. Why would I want my tax $ to go to her? No one gave me 10k when I bought a house, so I had to work and save money for years to get my house. But hey, it is C�ville, why would anyone have to work and take responsibility for there actions? Ms. Mallards can either follow the laws/building codes like everyone else. If she is incapable, then perhaps some form of state care is needed. But hey, let us give her money to live in a shack, which for 10k must be barely livable� by the way, can anyone else build a yurt in town? Perhaps I could buy some land and build a yurt village to rent out to for low rent�wait, I bet the same city that wants to build a yurt for Mallard would not give me the permits to do such. To enable her to walk the line of acceptable/unacceptable social living is well�unacceptable.
I agree w/BigAl. Taxpayers $$‘s should NOT be spent for this long standing problem. WHY has this woman not been picked up by the adult protection supervision for her safety and well being. I remember her well going back to the days when a dear neighbor commited suicide. It has been a horrible situation for a nice neighborhood for all these years.
What an innovative solution to the housing crisis! How Progressive! What’s next, a yurt encampment in Lee Park for all the innocent victims of that terrible disease, alcoholism? Maybe the city will start buying people Yaks so that they can have affordable, alternative, sustainable transportation.
If we’re all hip on doling out tax money, I’ve got a solution: a one-way ticket to state mental health hospital. Why do we choose to kowtow to people who are genuinely off their rocker?
Further more if the neighbors around the block think this is such a big problem…. and there are a few I know in that neighborhood that think that they are the only ones going to heaven!!!! Why don’t all of those neighbors get off their backsides and get together and pitch in and purchase the unit for her themselves. The time they spent fussing about it for 30 year could have been put to good use in helping her! GOD Helps those who help themselves. If you are not going to help then don’t complain about it! This is something that the neighborhood should have done beside moan and groan about it for 30 odd years.There are other that are sleeping in cars as you read this today but I don’t see the city paying for their housing! In the old days when a neighbor was in trouble the whole neighborhood was there!!! The end of times is surely here. Hell is going to jammed full of so called church folks!!!


Advertisement