Meadowcreek Parkway foes step up fight
Plans for the Meadowcreek Parkway are becoming more concrete, but some Charlottesville residents are doing everything in their power to stop the controversial route from being built.
“It’s a flawed project from the start,” city resident Stratton Salidis said.
The 2-mile parkway would connect East Rio Road in Albemarle County to the U.S. 250 bypass and McIntire Road in the city, and in so doing would take 22 acres of McIntire Park — to the dismay of many area residents.
Nonetheless, the project has been making steady progress. On Tuesday, the Virginia Department of Transportation began seeking bids to construct the county’s portion of the thoroughfare, for which officials have budgeted $25.4 million.
Work on the city’s piece, which costs roughly $30 million, is set to begin in May, trailing the county’s part by three months. But Peter Kleeman, a steadfast opponent of the parkway, said many of the project’s details remain shrouded in vagueness.
One such detail, he said, is the effect the roadway will have on historic properties, including McIntire Park and its golf course. Both are eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
The examination of the possible impacts, Kleeman said, should have been done before the project was granted any sort of approval — instead, it is just now beginning.
“How can you go out and make a commitment to some contractor to build a road if in fact the review process is not complete?” Kleeman asked.
Under federal law, state transportation agencies cannot approve paving public parkland for roads unless there is no feasible alternative and the project includes plans to minimize harm to the property. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and VDOT have just begun to study the proposed construction before necessary permits are granted, and Kleeman was invited to participate in a committee that will study the potential adverse effects on the park and its waterways.
“It’s very hard to argue that this is early in the process,” Kleeman said. He added that he thinks the push for the road originates in financial concerns. Building the road, he said, is not going to get any less expensive and current transportation budget woes are making officials act in haste.
Others attest that there are legal issues to be ironed out. Salidis said that the project should never have proceeded after the City Council’s vote in August. A provision in the Virginia Constitution, he said, clearly specifies that a 4-1 vote was needed to let the project move ahead. But councilors were split 3-2 in granting VDOT a temporary construction easement.
“They’re trying to disenfranchise the people of Charlottesville of their parks,” Salidis said.
In an attempt to contest what happened in August and halt the parkway, Salidis said the resident-driven Coalition to Preserve McIntire Park is raising funds to file suit against city officials.
He added, “We should not be giving up our central park for this, to increase sprawl in the county.”
City Attorney Craig Brown disputed the need for a 4-1 vote because the city will retain ownership of the property.
“An easement lays on top of the property. The ownership of the underlying property never changes,” Brown said. “The city is not selling anything.” Once construction of the parkway is complete, Brown said, the easement will expire and the parkland will remain under the city’s control.
Paige Mattson, owner of the Blue Ridge Eco Shop, said the uncertainties surrounding the project need to be resolved.
“There’s a lot of groups and organizations out there that are still trying to at least make sure the community is aware of what’s going on,” Mattson said. Since plans for the parkway began — four decades ago — the amount of green space in the city has shrunk and other alternatives should be reexamined, she said.
“As [citizens], we should all get involved,” Mattson said.
Reader Reactions
I apologize to Dan1101 for sounding harsh. That was not my intent. My intention was to show that there is no solution that is acceptable to anyone. And people won’t say what they mean, they beat around the bush. Instead of bringing facts to the discussion people bring baseless opinion and exaggeration like “Is building a new road in hundreds or thousands of people’s back yard the solution?“ which is not the truth. I fully understand about keeping C’ville Green. I do, but there needs to be a balance and it appears that there is no balance. Just delays after delays. The city promotes the down town mall all the time but to get there people on the north side of town use Park St because it is the most direct way to get there. Which I think is a ploy to drive up the cost until it’s not financially feasible to build. As for the Dredging pipe and dam. I think that needs to be reviewed with a fine toothed comb. With no price on the pipe and the Dam being improved in spurts sounds a bit fishy. But do we need Hoover Dam in C’ville. I do wonder where they are going to put all the silt that they dredge up and how much is it going to cost to dump and what is in the silt, i.e. heavy metals fertilizer who knows what. I have heard form people who have worked of RSA that the silt is pretty toxic when you dig down. If the silt is found to be a hazard than it may cost big $$$$ to dump.
Again Sorry to Dan1101
don’t throw stones woodrowski, as y9ou have made a few unsubstantiated assumption in your comments as well, by which we may judge you unflatteringly if we choose. The fact is that the parkway may in fact cause more and bigger problems for the city than it solves, and the annoyance to a few residents of park street may not be a good enough reason to build this road. the fact is that the route chosen may also be short sighted and out of date. So make sure you are in fact looking to the future when you chide others for not doing so: we are guaranted to have more roads in the future; lost parkland close to downtown will likely never be replaced. You seem to be championing a road that is a near term solution already past its expiration date. I understand your frustration but I think you are taking it out in the wrong place. There should still be a motion to change the route of the city portion of this road, just like we shoul dstill consider abandoning the horrible dam and pipeline “solution “ to our water needs. Ramming ahead with bad ideas because we’ve already wasted money and time on it is as bad and the original wastes themselves.
Well excuse me for having an opinion.
Dan1101 is a prime example of people who complain just to complain. Who provide no facts, just baseless drivle. It’s to bad that people who long to live in the past can’t accept the inevitable future.
No, I don’t live near either one. Yes, I’ve seen the plans. It goes behind the neighborhoods around the high school and behind the houses, apartments, and townhouses on Rio Road. Through a bunch of basically fields and wilderness.
I see this project as part of the continuing change of Charlottesville to another city with more pavement than greenery. Which is a shame.
People living next to the parkway will complain too, then they’ll probably put up the noise barrier walls like you see all over NoVa.
And I’m sure Dan1101 you live nowhere near it. Hundreds or Thousands? If you saw the plans you would know that what you are saying is just not true. This is just the kind of scare tactics we should expect from someone who has the delusion that if we do nothing things will go back to the way they were. Perhaps if you had a house on Park St. or worked downtown you would feel differently.
Park Street is what it is. It’s been a main artery for decades.
Is building a new road in hundreds or thousands of people’s back yard the solution?
This article does an excellent job as a platform for reporter Rachanna Dixit to express her personal opinion of the Meadowcreek Parkway.
actually, woodrowski, your concerns and saving the park are not mutually exclusive. the county portion can remain the same, and the city portion can be realigned to better serve the city’s needs. part of the reason the parkway is a bad idea as currently configured is that the route is a 40 year old relic. our leaders are now at the point that to admit that is to admit they have thrown away millions of dollar, so we will get this lame road when we could have done better, just because of momentum and mental laziness.
Great save the park. But what about the people who live on Park St. What about the people who use Park St to get to work. What about the neighborhoods that let out onto Park St. like the ones that people cut through when traffic backs up. It’s one of the main roads into C’ville. Should a 25mph residential road really be a main artery into town? I’ll bet the people who are against the MCP live on nice quiet roads with little traffic. Funny how they keep trying to make it seem like it’s being rushed when it’s a 40 year old project.
I hate it when the people think other people are stupid.


Advertisement