Fluvanna women’s prison segregated lesbians, others

Fluvanna women’s prison segregated lesbians, others

Associated Press

Summer Triolo, a former inmate at the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, says she was sent to a wing of the prison officers derisively dubbed the “butch wing.”

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

TROY — For more than a year, Virginia’s largest women’s prison rounded up inmates who had loose-fitting clothes, short hair or otherwise masculine looks, sending them to a unit officers derisively dubbed the “butch wing,” prisoners and guards say.

Dozens were moved in an attempt to split up relationships and curb illegal sexual activity at the 1,200-inmate Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, though some straight women were sent to the wing strictly because of their appearance, the inmates and corrections officers said.

Civil rights advocates called the moves unconstitutional punishment for “looking gay.” The warden denied that any housing decisions were made based on looks or sexual orientation, and said doing so would be discriminatory. The practice was stopped recently after the Associated Press began questioning it, according to several inmates and one current employee.

Two current guards and one of their former co-workers said targeting masculine-looking inmates was a deliberate strategy by a building manager. Numerous inmates said in letters and interviews that they felt humiliated and stigmatized when guards took them to the separate wing — also referred to by prisoners and guards as the “little boys wing,” “locker room wing” or “studs wing.”

“I deserved to go for my crime and I did my time there,” said Summer Triolo, who spent nearly six years at Fluvanna for theft before being released in February 2008. “But my punishment was by the judge to do time in prison away from my family and home. That was my punishment, not all the extra stuff.”

Conditions no worse?

Living conditions in wing 5D weren’t worse than the rest of the prison, and no prisoner said she was denied services other inmates received. However, the women said they were verbally harassed by staff who would make remarks such as, “Here come the little boys,” when they were escorted to eat, and they were taken to the cafeteria first or last to keep them away from other inmates. The three guards confirmed such remarks were made.

The two current guards and former guard William Drumheller said Building 5 manager Timothy Back, who is in charge of security and operations for that area, came up with the idea to break up couples by sending inmates to the wing. Gradually, they said, the 60-inmate wing was filled with women targeted because of their appearance. The current employees asked to remain anonymous for fear of losing their jobs.

“I heard him say, ‘We’re going to break up some of these relationships, start a boys wing, and we’re going to take all these studs and put them together and see how they like looking at nothing but each other all day instead of their girlfriends,”’ Drumheller said.

Drumheller said Back told him the plan one day in a prison office. The other two guards, who are both female, said Back’s reasons for moving the prisoners were commonly known among guards, though officials would deny the reasons for the moves if inmates asked or complained.

Warden denies move

Warden Barbara Wheeler called the policy a figment of the inmates’ imaginations.

“With female offenders, relationships are very important, and often times when they’re separated from those relationships they might perceive it as punitive,” Wheeler said.

Wheeler said her employees wouldn’t segregate inmates based on looks or sexual orientation, and she wouldn’t condone it.

“That’s like saying I want to put all the blacks in one unit and all the whites in one unit,” something federal courts have ruled illegal, she said.

A dozen inmates interviewed in person or by letter contradicted Wheeler, saying there’s no doubt why they were moved. Triolo said she had gone four years without getting in trouble until she shaved her shoulder-length brown locks. She soon was moved to 5D, away from her girlfriend.

Triolo and Trina O’Neal were two of the first inmates sent to 5D in the fall of 2007.

“I have been gay all my life and never have I once felt as degraded, humiliated or questioned my own sexuality, the way I look, etc., until all of this happened,” O’Neal, 33, who is serving time for forgery and drug charges, wrote to the AP.

Drumheller worked at Fluvanna for two years but said he quit in August because he didn’t like the inmates’ treatment.

The prison declined repeated requests for an interview with Back, and the AP could not find a working home telephone number for him.

Sex — whether forced, coerced or consensual — is forbidden in prisons primarily to prevent violence and the spread of diseases.

Segregating gay inmates in men’s prison has been upheld by federal courts to protect them and maintain order, though courts have ruled against total isolation or harsher conditions.

Separating women based on appearance, though, violates the Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection and freedom of expression, said Helen Trainor, director of the Virginia Institutionalized Persons Project.

“Point blank, this institution is ran by homophobes, and the rules instated here are based on your sexual preference not what is right or wrong,” wrote inmate Casey Lynn Toney.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by tdonavant on June 16, 2009 at 2:24 pm

Referring to the post by “bandit”, I believe he or she may be the naive one. Discrimination exists in all walks of life, none of us are immune. These guards are humans and there have been many studies done that show the abusive nature that often time takes over when one is put into a role of authority or power. I believe that most people, put in this situation would succumb to treating the inmates less than human. They have to if they want to make it in the job. If not they may be the target of some of the more experienced guards who perceive them as soft or weak. I doubt the people who want to make positive changes for the inmates get promotions or last very long in this line of work. They soon become “whistleblowers” or leave this career field.
I know that FCCW is not the well oiled machine that many believe it to be. There are so many contradictions among staff members that the inmates don’t stand a chance of not being written a “charge”. There are many women housed in this facility who have decided for whatever reason to look “butch” it does not mean they are all homosexuals. Fortunatley, I do not know what it is like to have to adapt to this kind of environment but in many cases it is a survival mechanism. A female who takes on the male persona is (not always but) much less likely to be targeted by other inmates, being perceived as tough. The inmates hair is not supposed to be past their collars.  Inmates have been denied visitation because their hair was deemed too long by one officer when the same inmate passed three or four other officers (even been through a strip search) on the way to visitation who apparently didn’t have a problem with the length of their hair. I suppose shaving their heads would solve this problem but then they are riduculed and made fun of by some of the officers. They can’t just make an appointment with cometology because that in itself is a real ordeal. They have irregular hours, skip certain building, etc. There rules change depending on who is on duty or who is on a power trip for the day but one thing could solve most of the problems is CONSISTENCY.

Flag Comment Posted by bandit on June 11, 2009 at 5:12 pm

Are people really so naive to believe this mess?? Officers in prisons must deal with CONVICTED murderers, rapists, thieves, LIARS, etc, etc.
Are there some officers that behave poorly. Possibly. But look at the so called “officers” the article mentions. A former officer that quit because he “didn’t like the inmate’s treatment.“ How many people do you know that would quit a $30,000/year STATE job job for that reason. if it’s so bad do something to change it!

Flag Comment Posted by TDRSWEETIE02 on June 11, 2009 at 11:47 am

Im sorry but some of the guards at Fluvanna are unfair and treat the imates like they are animals, and like they have no rights at all just because they are in there.  And the Warden doesn’t know half of the stuff that goes on in her prison.  I know this because my sister is there and she has 2 1/2 more years to go before she comes home. And i don’t see what difference it makes, on how the inamtes dress, look like, because it is a rule in the prison for them to have short hair cuts, and the clothes they wear are they clothes that are given to them.  Yeah some of the clothes they can order theirself, but if they don’t work or nobody sends them money then the only clothes they have are the ones that are government issued. And I don’t really see what why it matters to the guards what sexuall perfernce the inamtes have, as long as the inmates are not miss behaving, it shouldn’t.  It doesn’t matter to me and I go visit my sister every of weekend. That is also how I know that some of the guards are nice and some are just plain jerks.

Flag Comment Posted by banjo on June 11, 2009 at 9:30 am

If there is much sexual interaction going on, that is the first problem to deal with. It is a prison, not a social club.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Special Reports
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement