Forged letters scandal widens

Forged letters scandal widens
» 17 Comments | Post a Comment

The Washington lobbying firm that sent forged letters to U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello — and at least two other congressmen — was working on behalf of a coal industry advocacy group.
The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity said its longtime grassroots contractor, the Hawthorn Group, had hired Bonner & Associates to do “limited outreach” in opposition to the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.
The president of ACCCE, which is headquartered in Alexandria and represents a consortium of coal companies, said he was “outraged” that bogus letters sent to members of congress originated at Bonner & Associates.
“ACCCE has always maintained high ethical and professional standards,” said Stephen L. Miller, the coalition’s president, in a statement. “In this case, the standards and practices that we require for grassroots advocacy outreach were not adhered to by Bonner and Associates. In this sense, the community groups involved, the Members of Congress who received the fraudulent letters, as well as ACCCE, were all victimized by this misconduct.”
The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity spent more than $11.8 million on lobbying between April 1 and June 30, according to lobbying disclosure forms filed with the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. The American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as the cap-and-trade bill, was introduced in the House on May 15.

‘Misconduct ... deception’

Miller said that ACCCE is looking into the possibility of legal action in connection with the bogus letters controversy.
“Because of Bonner and Associates’ misconduct, we apologize to the community groups and the Members of Congress involved,” he said. “There is no place for this type of deception. We applaud efforts to ensure that everyone involved in the public policy dialogue lives up to the highest ethical standards.”
Bonner & Associates has not returned multiple calls for comment. The firm has sent statements to other media outlets, such as the Washington Post and the Associated Press, that blames the letters on a temporary employee who the company said was fired after it discovered the forgeries.
Perriello, a Democrat who represents the Charlottesville region, was not the only congressman to receive forged letters urging him to oppose the cap-and-trade legislation. Reps. Kathy Dahlkemper and Christo-pher Carney, both Democrats from Pennsylvania, also received falsified letters that originated at Bonner & Associates, the coal industry group said.
The coal industry group’s spokeswoman, Lisa Miller, said Bonner & Associates sent a total of 12 letters to the three members of Congress. Perriello received eight of the letters, she said.

“This is so contrary to the way that our organization is accustomed to operating,” Miller said. “It’s embarrassing and outrageous.”
Perriello’s office discovered six phony letters, one forged to look as if it came from Charlottesville-based Hispanic group Creciendo Juntos and the other five were forged to appear as if they originated with the Albemarle-Charlottesville chapter of the NAACP. The letters urged Perriello to oppose the landmark piece of clean energy legislation. “We ask you to use your important position to help protect minorities and other consumers in your district from higher electricity bills,” the letters said. “Please don’t vote to force cost increases on us, especially in this volatile economy.”
The letters were sent on faked letterhead and were signed by nonexistent members of the two Charlottes-ville minority organizations.
Creciendo Juntos does not take positions on such political issues. The NAACP actually supports the American Clean Energy and Security Act, as the civil rights organization believes it would create jobs for minorities and improve the environment in urban areas.
Jessica Barba, Perriello’s press secretary, said Tuesday that two previously undisclosed letters were forged to appear as if they were sent by the Jefferson Area Board for Aging, a Charlottesville agency, and the American Association of University Women.
The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity first learned of the forged letters on June 24, the organization said in a background document sent to reporters.

“Based upon information ACCCE received from the Hawthorn Group, it was Bonner and Associates’ own internal process that identified these falsified letters and it was Mr. Bonner who first brought this to the attention of the Hawthorn Group. ACCCE was then made aware of the situation by Hawthorn on June 24, 2009,” the document said. “In that discussion, we were assured by Hawthorn that senior management with Bonner and Associates had committed to making personal contacts with the affected organizations and the congressional offices who received falsified letters. Throughout this process, ACCCE has been told that Bonner and Associates had made contacts with the affected organizations and was continuing to make contacts with congressional offices. It was only by reading last Friday’s media accounts that we learned that these matters had not been satisfactorily resolved.”
In a July 22 letter to Creciendo Juntos, a partner with Bonner & Associates, Gwynn Geiger Hegyi, called the forged letters a “mistake” and said the company had already fired the staffer responsible.
After the forged letters were revealed in a Friday news story by The Daily Progress, U.S. Rep. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., co-author of the cap-and-trade bill and chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, announced that he was launching an investigation into Bonner & Associates.
Markey sent a letter to the “strategic grassroots” lobbying firm on Monday asking for answers to 12 questions, including about Bonner & Associates’ practices, details about the employee responsible for the letters and whether faked letters were sent to other members of Congress. Markey is also seeking any documents related to the firm’s activities in connection to the cap-and-trade bill.
Bonner & Associates has until Aug. 12 to respond to Markey’s request.

Calls for prosecution

Since Friday, news about the forged letters has sparked outrage, particularly among environmentalist groups and other liberal-leaning organizations.
The Sierra Club is requesting that the U.S. Department of Justice open an investigation into the activities of Bonner & Associates.
Patrick Gallagher, legal director of the Sierra Club, sent a letter Monday to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that suggests the forgeries may have violated federal laws against wire fraud.
“Rep. Perriello’s ultimate decision to vote in favor of the clean energy bill would not preclude prosecution of Bonner & Associates, as it is well established that a fraudulent scheme that does not actually cause harm is still actionable,” Gallagher wrote. “… Furthermore, the harm in this case does not end at Rep. Perriello’s vote, but encompasses a constituent’s belief that her representative values her true opinion, and that her representative considers her true opinion when contemplating proposed legislation.”
While Perriello voted in favor of the energy bill, Carney and Dahlkemper voted against the measure.
Ian McCaleb, a Justice Department spokesman, declined to comment Tuesday on the possibility of a criminal investigation. “We’re not commenting on that issue at this time,” he said.

The Sierra Club is also running advertisements about the forged letters this week in Roll Call, The Hill, CongressDaily, Politico and Congressional Quarterly. The ad’s headline reads: “The Coalition To Kill Clean Energy Jobs.”
“When Dirty-Energy Washington Lobbyists couldn’t get any real-life supporters to defeat comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation, they made them up instead,” the ad says. “Washington Lobbyists actually impersonated the NAACP and Hispanic organization Creciendo Juntos in their letters to pressure legislators. Luckily, it was a losing battle and now they’re being investigated by Congress and others. America needs more clean energy jobs — not tall tales from Washington Lobbyists.”
The ad features images of assorted “tall tales,” including a flying saucer, Pinocchio, Little Red Riding Hood and Bigfoot.
MoveOn.org, a left-leaning political group, has started an online petition drive to urge the Department of Justice to open an investigation into Bonner & Associates.
Larry J. Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, said legitimate questions remain about the phony letters sent to Perriello and the other two members of Congress.
“The real question is whether the full story is known,” Sabato said. “Was it simply a rogue employee, as the Bonner group suggests? Or is it part of a broader pattern in the ‘Astroturf’ lobbying industry? My guess would be the former, but the latter can’t be ruled out without looking into it. One can debate whether it deserves a full-blown congressional investigation, given the challenges the country is facing right now, but someone in authority ought to at least verify the explanation being offered by Bonner.”

Open communication

Sabato added that the controversy highlights the broader issue of constituent communication to congressmen.
“For years, legislators have told me that they are wary of much of what comes into their office by mail and telephone. They can’t say it publicly because it looks like they don’t care what their constituents think, which isn’t true, but elected officials are not dummies. They’ve figured out that much of their communications come from trumped-up campaigns that are full of misinformation and prefabricated messages,” Sabato said. “One thing that hasn’t changed in the 40-plus years I’ve been in and around politics, other than a personal chat with a congressman, nothing beats a well-crafted, thoughtful letter by someone in possession of the facts — signed by a real person in the district. Those are the letters chosen for individual attention by the legislator and the staff.”

Advertisement

 
View More: forged letters,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by antiboyd on August 12, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Mr Michael, I’ll actually give Tom the benefit of the doubt, that when he’s done reading the latest version of House Bill xxx, he’s also keeping up with Science (from Astronomy through Zoology), Medicine, Communications, Enginnering, Law, etc.

Personally, I don’t give a rat’s behind whether modern science du jour believes there is Global Warming, or a bunch of bannana-headed wingnuts from the right believe the Netherworld is about to freeze over. It’s common sense: pollution is bad. If you don’t have to—I mean, really have to, don’t. So, I am all for reducing the rather unnecessary consumption of non-renewable, pollution-creating resources.

You know that scene from the Blues Brothers, looking out past South Chicago toward Gary and Hammond? Been there. The Monongohela catching fire? The Love Canal? Three Mile Island? Seered in my memory.

If we could get everybody to ride bikes to work, than gather together after work around a campfire and sing songs, that might be sweet.

But, please, please, don’t sell me this Trojan Horse of a Bill that doesn’t do anything more than line the pockets of the few at the expense of the many, and in no way makes a dent in the goal at hand.

I’m just really tired, at this point, of government concocted “solutions” that enrich corporations.

What, exactly, was not working—why the need for a charade? Inappropriate standards? Lack of regulation and oversight? Education?

At the end of the day, it all comes down to being “conservative”. And I’m down with that!  smile

Flag Comment Posted by TMichael on August 12, 2009 at 10:08 am

Not man-made global warming? Hmmmm, the IPCC puts the chance at 90% and nobody seems willing to publish articles in respected journals arguing with it (www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686). While I agree that Al Gore is not the best place too get accurate science (he is a politician after all), I do believe that the most respected scientific journals in the country are (namely: Science and Nature). While debate (unlike your “gas dictating temperature” comment) is a basic tenet of Science, I suggest you do your research through peer-reviewed journal articles and not subjective websites.

Also, the author’s of this bill have worked extremely hard to ensure that it does NOT have a disproportionately harsh impact on those already unable to afford their utility bills. For the average American, it will only cost a dime a day. In terms of Perriello’s “wasteful deficit spending,” this bill will actually have a net positive impact on the federal budget (http://tinyurl.com/ACEScost). You suggest that we not blame the oil companies, I agree. We are all responsible for this and we all must work to fix it.

Flag Comment Posted by j carney on August 11, 2009 at 9:49 pm

This mischief really deters from the real debate over global warming. Yes, there may be global warming but this is NOT MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING, if that were the case wouldn’t the temperatures increased during the industrial revolution in which the largest increase in CO2 occurred since we have been on earth? It did not, it actually subsided!! The core samples in Al Gore’s drama (not a documentary- too many factual errors) actually indicate that the increases in CO2 and other greenhouse gases lag increases in temperature and not the other way around.  A basic tenet of science is that temperature dictates gases, gases do not dictate temperature.  Also CO2 is one of the smallest components of greenhouse gases and one of the least influential of all greenhouse gases, water vapor is the largest component of all greenhouse gases, are you going to eliminate water vapor also?  As for the polar ice caps they have been devoid of ice for most of earth’s existence.  Polar bears and other artic wildlife have survived those periods. Check the science on this, the debate is still in its infancy despite what erudite scientists like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid say.  We only have ~130 years of accurate temperature measurements. If you are basing theories on this, maybe you should put some stock in the last 15 years of global cooling.  This debate is far from nearing conclusion.  Start doing some research before you invoke the destructive cap and trade bill, which is essentially a pass through gov’t tax to consumers.  This is most likely to hurt the poor and those on fixed incomes, grandmothers who can hardly afford their heating oil as it is. One question: Have you and Tom Perriello really thought this through or are you just jumping on the green bandwagon? Do some research!!!!!
That said, there is nothing wrong with conservation and reducing waste and pollution just don’t blame oil companies b/c you like to drive a few hours to the beach on the weekend or companies that produce the products you buy. These companies are, for the most part a beneficial part of this earth just like you.

Flag Comment Posted by j carney on August 11, 2009 at 7:53 am

Everyone is getting tired of this outrageous and wasteful deficit spending.  Perriello would be wise to steer clear of the gigantic expenses involved in the health care bill. I bet there are at least a couple hundred seniors, more likely thousands who do not want cut rate health care proposed by Obama and Pelosi.  These seniors will surely bail on Perriello who enjoyed the narrowest margins of victory in all of congress last year.  Much less the exorbitant spending plans by Obama with little in place to help the current economic situation but large future sums creating record deficits to be paid off by our grandchildren.  Seriously, has this administration and Perriello ever heard of cutting spending!!!?  Perriello stand up for your constituents and don’t let far left liberals steam roll you, I doubt your predecessors would allow it.  They may be back in office if your far left voting continues.

Flag Comment Posted by TMichael on August 07, 2009 at 8:27 am

Antiboyd, no it isn’t Al Gore or Michael Moore. I’m not talking about politicians that can’t be trusted. I’m talking scientists. People who dedicate their lives to trying to identify objective truths. No, they aren’t always right, but they’re a heck of a lot closer than most of us. If you’re curious about global warming, perhaps you should check out the most respected peer-reviewed, refereed scientific journals out there: www.sciencemag.org and www.nature.com.

I’m just glad we have a politician in office such as Perriello that votes based on the best science out there.

Flag Comment Posted by antiboyd on August 06, 2009 at 8:08 pm

Me? I’m still trying to figure out how the proposed legislation will reduce any of the following examples of excess pollution and foul air:

Kyoto, Japan—among the filthiest, most pollued sites in the world.

Bonner & Associates, and every other bogus entity that propogates fraud, including most lobbyists, most unions, most PACs, the NRA, the ALCU, ACORN, FannieMae, Congress, the AMA, the ATLA, Chicago and Cook County, the Treasury Department, Eric Holder’s group, Bank of America, Ken Boyd, the folks who peddle Extenze…

Global warming, or is it climate change, or is it Al Gore and Michael Moore?

Flag Comment Posted by Gordie on August 06, 2009 at 1:48 pm

javaguy just what is low level intelligence.
1. completely ignore the facts and making up lies.
2. Adults that act like children yelling and screaming to drown out others. A child who cannot get their way. one with emotional disabilities that over take their reasoning.
3.People who walk around with tea bags attached to their heads.
4.Birthers: the inability to believe what is fact. Unable to know that a document from Australia was forged to make the documnet to appear like a Kenya birth certiciate.
5.Birthers; live with a theory that a newspaper story published in 1961 was all forged so in 2007-8 their son could run for president of the US.
6.Believing that because some one of much wealth says something, the receiver believes it is the truth.
7.When it is definately proven for years that the earth is round, people still believe the earth is flat.
8.When science proves that the earth is billions of years old, the low educated cling to a story that the earth is only 6,000 years old.

Now everything I have written has been expressed by the people who have been written about in the paper recently. They actually walk around carrying signs that express those feelings of low level emotional intelligence.

For you to call me out on that, just proves how naive you are.
It has nothing to do with whether I am a Conservative, Liberal, Libaterian, or an Independent. It is the fact of ones behavior and demonstrates their level of intelligence.

Yes, you could write that because I wrote what I wrote it questions my intelligence. I would rather have you question my intelligence, then to be silent about people without intelligence trying to run my life.

Flag Comment Posted by TMichael on August 06, 2009 at 9:31 am

Wow! That’s all I’ve got to say. Forging letters to congress wasn’t low enough for coal industry lobbyists. They actually had the gall to forge letters pretending to be minority organizations that supported the bill. More proof the coal industry is running scared and will do anything to keep their wallets full. I’m glad Perriello’s office is on their toes.

Hopefully this is a limited incident and won’t extend to impacting the senate’s vote. Most people realize that our country needs the economic benefits and security of the clean energy bill. This is why so many organizations support it, from environmental groups, to the NAACP, to unions like United Auto Workers and US Steelworkers of America, to businesses such as Duke Energy and ALCOA.

Please let your Senators know you support the clean energy bill. It is the only way to ensure that special interest groups don’t kill this landmark legislation.

Flag Comment Posted by javaguy on August 06, 2009 at 8:53 am

Gordie I don’t even know why I bother to respond to someone like you. How dare you call these Tea party participants “low educated people”. I guess because they enjoy personal freedom and don’t want to be controlled by government they must be stupid. You use the typical tactic of the left insult and marginalize those that disagree with you. It is you that is showing your ignorance.

Flag Comment Posted by Gordie on August 06, 2009 at 8:17 am

Buzzorn do you really believe that “Senate, House of Reps. and President” get letter head of others and sends out forged letters.
Those are the words of a wacko.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Special Reports
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement