Mall makeover to come sooner
The Daily Progress/Megan Lovett
Charlottesville’s City Council has taken on an ambitious timeline for its Downtown Mall renovation plans — which include utility upgrades, new art installments and rebricking of the mall itself. A spring finish is planned.
Charlottesville is expediting and consolidating the construction timeline for the Downtown Mall renovations in hopes of avoiding a prolonged overhaul that disrupts businesses and inconveniences shoppers.
At its June 16 meeting, city councilors are expected to add $4.5 million for the project into the budget year that begins July 1, enabling construction to begin and finish in the first half of next year.
Originally the restoration — slated to include the rebricking of the mall, upgrading of utilities, addition of fountains and art installments, and replacement of lights and furniture — was to be extended over the next few years, with funding allotted throughout that span. Now most of the $7.5 million cost will be included in the city’s 2009 bond package.
Downtown business owners convinced the city that it would be best to handle the renovations in the same way one would go about removing a bandage: get all the pain over with in one short burst.
The city now has an ambitious timeline of starting construction in January and finishing by the end of spring.
“Once the warm weather comes around and the mall turns back into the lively social gathering place, we need to get out of there,” said Joe Schinstock, the project manager for MMM Design Group.
Business owners and councilors lauded the accelerated construction pace and said it would minimize the impact on the community..
“I’d much rather see it done in a short period of time than spread out over years,” said Morgan MacKenzie-Perkins, co-owner of Sage Moon Gallery. “If you extend it, then we are always under construction, and that has a very negative connotation for people who want to shop.”
Owners have expressed concern about the ramifications of the mall renovations and how they would affect business. Those fears were heightened after the rebricking of Third Street Northeast earlier this year took six months longer than projected.
The city retorts that it learned valuable lessons from the previous delays and that it has been working with the business owners to ensure there is ample access to their businesses during the renovations. A business owner on each block has been appointed to serve as a liaison to the city and project managers.
“We believe we have a working plan that will allow for adequate, if not very good, access to the businesses during the entire span of the project,” said Bob Stroh, co-chairman of the Downtown Business Association.
The phasing of the renovation is still a work in progress, but the rebricking is likely to begin at Central Place and then spread outward.
For years, patrons and business owners have expressed concern about the condition of the brick pathway. In many spots the bricks are uneven or there are chasms between conjoining bricks, leading to a slew of lost heels, injuries and embarrassing tripping episodes.
A debate is raging in architecture circles over the best way to replace the bricks, which were laid between 1976 and 1979.
The city does not want to keep using 4-inch-by-12-inch bricks because it would be overly expensive to transport them from Nebraska — the location of the closest manufacturer — and because they can tip under great weight. Instead, officials are looking at 5-inch-by-10-inch bricks.
But the city’s architectural board is not thrilled with that idea. It declined last month to endorse the new brick size and asked the planners to come back with more information.
“I think that concern is rising in the design community in town about the degree to which the renovation of the mall could change its character,” said Fred Wolf, a member of the architectural board.
Councilors have echoed that sentiment. They have instructed city staff to stick close to the original design by Lawrence Halprin.
“The mall we have is very clean and an elegantly designed space,” said Councilor Satyendra Huja, who was the city’s head planner when the mall was bricked over in the 1970s. “It is not wise to mess with something that is working well.”
Therefore, councilors have told planners they do not want two new large fountains on the mall, which would cost several hundred thousand dollars each. The three existing fountains will be upgraded and two smaller fountains will still be built.
Additionally, the plans call for space for a public display of art; a children’s playground on the east end; and a “sister city” plaza on the west end.
The $7.5 million project will not include the bricking of any side streets, something Mayor Dave Norris would like to see down the road.
“I think [bricking the side streets] enhances the pedestrian character of the downtown and extends the mall farther north and south,” he said.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
How about this for an idea….
Why doesn’t the city pick a couple more of the side streets downtown to rebrick. This would give them a chance to prove to concerned vendors, like myself and my wife, that they not only “learned valuable lessons” but have the ability to act on them as well.
We’ve all “learned” that fast food is bad for me, hasn’t stopped us from eating it.
Frankly, given the Transit Center overruns and the travisty that Third Street Northeast became, the two biggest downtown city projects in recent memory, their track record doesn’t instill a lot of confidence.
We have paid enough plumbing bills on our downtown stores to know that work needs to be done on a lot more than just the bricks. But if they screw this one up…we…are…out…of…business. Good luck getting that tax increase out of us then.
Do you guys remember the city initiative back around 2002 to redo a number of city crosswalks in brick? To the tune of thousands of dollars each. A short time later many of us watched in absolute disbelief, as city employees paved them over with asphault, used a machine to stamp “brick-esque” shapes, and finish of with a nice coat of red paint.
The more I think about, the more I would like the city to outline the “valuable lessons” they have learned and layout concrete (ouch! no pun intended) examples of solutions and the ramifications if specific goals are not met.
Replacing the old bricks on the Mall should be a priority item. City planners have found a cheaper, faster, and ultimately safer solution than using the old style bricks. The Architectural Review Board should be ignored in this case—most pedestrians do not notice the bricks on the pavement until they trip over them—and the City Council should put the ARB on notice that if it persists in such silly rulings Council will take action to reduce its authority.


Advertisement