Perriello defends health care vote
U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Ivy, on Monday defended his vote in favor of the health care reform package, saying it will reduce the federal deficit, make health coverage more affordable for middle-class families and small businesses and greatly expand coverage for the uninsured.
“The choice was between solving the problem and sitting on the sidelines,” Perriello said in a conference call with reporters Monday.
Moments after Perriello cast his vote in support of the Affordable Health Care for America Act late Saturday, the Republicans pounced.
“It’s not often that a member of Congress manages to lose his re-election bid one year in advance, but that’s what Tom Perriello did tonight,” Andy Seré, a regional press secretary for the National Republican Congressional Committee, wrote in an e-mail.
Perriello is widely expected to be among the GOP’s top targets in the 2010 mid-term congressional elections.
Perriello’s district — which runs from the Charlottesville region down to Danville — was long represented by Republican Virgil H. Goode Jr. until Perriello ousted him last year by only 727 votes. In last Tuesday’s election, GOP gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell carried the district with 61.4 percent of the vote.
The health care vote is already becoming a top campaign issue for the six Republicans vying to win their party’s backing to take on Perriello in fall 2010.
“It’s a case of Perriello not representing the interests of his district,” said Albemarle County Super-visor Kenneth C. Boyd, who is seeking the GOP nomination. “The U.S. takeover of the health care system is not what the district wanted.”
‘I strongly oppose’
Ivy resident Laurence Verga, another GOP candidate, said in a news release that the health care measure is far too expensive, will still leave 25 million people uninsured, will lead to higher health premium costs and does not appear to be constitutional.
“Congressman Perri-ello’s support of HR 3962 is unjustified in explanation, unrepresentative of his constituents’ expressed desires, and it is essentially anti-American in its nature,” Verga said in the release. “I strongly oppose this bill, and I condemn Congressman Perriello for his vote in favor of socializing American healthcare — a vote that will live in infamy.”
Ben Marchi, state director of Americans for Prosperity, which opposes the health care reform legislation, wrote in an e-mail: “In a district that gave Gov.-elect Bob McDonnell 61 percent this week, Perriello — who won by 727 votes last year — just voted for the tax-raising, Medicare-cutting government healthcare takeover after claiming for months that he opposed it.”
Perriello hosted 21 town hall meetings over the summer to gather constituent feedback on the bill. At the time, he said he was leaning toward a “no” vote. He became a “yes,” he said, after the bill was amended to address his concerns over the federal deficit and federal funding for abortion.
The final House version, he said, would cut the deficit by $109 billion in the first decade and is expected to continue reducing the deficit in the following decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Perriello voted for the so-called Stupak-Pitts amendment of the bill, which stipulates that no federal funds will be used for abortion. Perriello promised at the town hall meetings that he would not support the bill if it funded abortion.
Marchi’s group is holding a rally against Perriello’s vote at 10 a.m. today outside the congressman’s district office at 312 Second St. S.E. in downtown Charlottesville.
Perriello said the health care reform legislation — which passed 220 to 215 — will greatly benefit residents and small businesses in his district.
Roughly 62 percent of the district’s population receives health care benefits from employers. Under the bill, these 409,000 individuals and families with employer-based coverage can keep their coverage and also see several improvements, Perriello’s office said. The bill ensures that there will be no co-pays or deductibles for preventative care, no more rate increases or coverage denials for pre-existing conditions, and guaranteed oral, vision and hearing benefits for children.
The legislation provides credits to help pay for health care coverage for up to 183,000 households in the district, according to a fact sheet by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. And it is likely to provide health coverage for 53,000 uninsured residents, the fact sheet said.
The package also closes over the next decade the Medicare Part D drug “donut hole” that requires 12,500 seniors in the district to pay the full cost of their prescription drugs, the sheet states.
Small businesses in the district will be able to obtain affordable health coverage and receive tax benefits to defray health insurance costs under the legislation, Perriello said.
Ellen Jessee, a small business owner from Collinsville, spoke during Perriello’s conference call and said reform is “desperately needed” to help business owners provide employees with health benefits.
The Charlottesville-based Virginia Organizing Project applauded Perriello for supporting the bill.
Call in with feedback
“His vote proves he is on the side of the American people and not the big insurance companies and special interests that have been working overtime to try and kill meaningful health care reform,” said Janice “Jay” Johnson, head of the organization, in a news release. “Because of Congressman Perriello’s commitment to do what’s right for his constituents, we can look forward to having more affordable health coverage with good, comprehensive benefits and true choice and competition in the health insurance marketplace.”
Perriello is still gathering feedback from constituents on the health care reform issue. He is sponsoring a free telephone town hall meeting with constituents on from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. Thursday. To participate, call 1-877-269-7289 and enter the pass code 14581.
The call is toll free.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Juno Moneta thanks for the links. I went to the politic link and in there story was a link to the report.
Yes the report says it will increase costs by almost 300 bil. Did you notice that they said they left out paying for the bill.
When ever a bill is passed it will most certainly cost more in 10-20 years, but the trick is figuring out how to pay for it, so it is deficit neutral. Which this bill is paid for.
Did you also notice that the Medicare fund was funded for another 5 years by HR 3962, making Medicare solvent till 2022.
Thanks for the link. The report seems to be what is in the eye of the beholder. I can find so many many positive issues in the bill. Far more positives then negatives.
Sure, Gordie.
Here’s a link to short piece posted on politico.com discussing the findings:
http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1109/CMS_House_bill_increases_health_care_costs_.html#
And here’s a link to the report itself:
http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/UploadedFiles/OACT_Memorandum_on_Financial_Impact_of_H_R__3962__11-13-09_.pdf
Juno Moneta I just Google what you report and no such report shows up. Could you post your source?
antiboyd it really surprises me you have said nothing about HR 3961 {that I can recall), which has more to do with the medical benefits you worry about, then HR 3962.
Sadly, Perriello is almost certainly wrong when he claims the House bill he voted for will reduce health care costs.
A report just released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (part of the Federal Government) concludes that if implemented this legislation will INCREASE health care costs by almost $300 billion (yes, billion) over the next decade.
Nancy Pelosi has not done right by Perriello or the nation by insisting the House vote on major legislation before the government had the chance to analyze its financial consequences.
antiboyd you seem to have lost it. Nothing I said on this post deserves the ranting you have displayed early this morning. I think you are responding to me from some another post and are confused in some type of anger. What I have posted came from Tom’s Web site and is back up by the CBO.
Hey, I am a Democrat and proud of it. I believe in taking care of the homeless and all others of misfortune in our society. Certainly I believe in taking care of the homeless also because some of them are vets, from the stupid wars. Especially Iraq.
Like posting on the wrong story, you also have me confused with someone else.
Anti,
I would not be a bit surprised to find out we know each other, or at least know someone in common.
Think of the most optimistic person you know, who is always whistling a tune.
Gordie, with all due respect, your citation, reference, and conclusions make no sense whatsoever. I admit to having only four years of direct working experience with Medicare Reimbursement, for a Hospital and its medical practices, which may only certify me as an experienced practicioner, as opposed to an old coot sifting through legislative language.
Look, bud, you are no more in a position to lecture me, or teach me, or instruct me, or whatever it is you think you are doing, than the next looney toon. I’m sorry to be so mean, in a way, but you’ve absolutely pushed the wrong buttons—namely, lay of the QWERTY, until you can apply 1) some civility 2) some humility 3) some knowledge.
I’ve got an overnight assignment with the area homeless, who quite honestly, rate. I don’t care what you, or the others who call them trash that need to be thrown away say—at least they show some humility—and not once, btw, have they shown a sense of entitlement. Remarkably different, I must say, than your tone and attitude.
When I get some time, I’ll outline those sections and what they mean—and why your coments are absolutely wrong. I’d tell you to take a course, but can tell you think you already know everything; but really, you could do some real good, instead of writing love notes to pols, actually volunteering your time to people who need help.
Peace.
‘Foe’, fwiw, I’ve visited both dark sides… Hayesknows owes me a coffee, maybe we can bum one off the beanmeister one day. It’s not really a bad idea—most of the time, once we meet the other guy, they aren’t so bad as they seem, and there tends to be common ground. There’s hope. I see Bill is not falling for Boyd. That’s a good thing, in my book.
He rolls over for Pelosi and Reid so his town hall meetings were a waste of time. He knew how he was going to vote and wasn’t interested in what his constituents wanted. Well, with luck he will not survive the next election.
The idea that this bill will reduce the federal deficit (by 30 billion over 10 years!) is laughable. Revenue from hundreds of billions in taxes does not take into account the reduction in tax revenues we’ll be seeing in future years, nor does it take into account the inevitable unintended increases in costs.
These are the same folks who told us that U3 unemployment would not reach 10% in 2009. Surprise, surprise. They’re simply making up numbers, and idiots will continue to believe their fabrications since they come from “experts” who are consistently wrong.
Nice one, Perriello.
Lol, twinmom…go get em’.


Advertisement