Orange officials respond to Walmart challenge
Published: September 25, 2009
ORANGE — Orange County will “vigorously defend” its decision to grant a special-use permit to Wal-mart Stores Inc. for a Supercenter near the Wilderness Civil War battlefield.
In a statement issued Thursday, county attorney Sharon E. Pandak responded to a legal challenge filed Wednesday by preservationists and residents who live near the Locust Grove site for the 138,000-square-foot store.
The Circuit Court lawsuit is aimed at blocking construction of the store near the Wilderness, one of the nation’s most endangered Civil War battlefields. Opponents contend the store will be a blight on history.
Pandak said supervisors met all procedural requirements and provided plenty of opportunity for public com-ment.
She said the board will seek to have the lawsuit dismissed.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
It is nothing short of tragic that our elected officials continue to act as though big business, or big oil, or big banks, or big health insurers were their constituents, instead of those who actually made the mistake of voting for them. Unfortunately, before they can vote them out, they will already have sacrificed the Wilderness Battlefield to Wal-Mart, and no one will be able to fix the institutional vandalism they have inflicted.
This is especially tragic because another, more suitable, less intrusive site is available nearby. I do not live in Orange County, but I am very familiar with the area, because it is on the way to Sweet Briar College, where I graduated in 1967, and also on the way to my best friend’s family home in the Northern Neck.
More importantly, I live in a National Historic Landmark village in Loudoun County where developers have been allowed to run amok since the early 1960’s, and where we are now living with the hard consequences, both financial and in quality of life, of governmental pandering to the developers and helping them to line their pockets at our expense.
I sympathize with the previous comment, and wish that government officials could learn from the experience of others, rather than forcing their constituents to suffer the consequences of their having to reinvent the wheel every time. That is, of course, the charitable interpretation. The other, probably more realistic one, is that they have been moved to support Wal-Mart against their constituents by some sort of financial emoluments. In the latter case, poetic justice would demand that they be haunted forever by the ghosts of the Wilderness Campaign.
Obviously the board does what it wants regardless of what the majority of people want.
I attended both meetings at the Orange County High School and the people opposed definitely out numbered the people for the “greed giant”. Also independent polls show the majority do not want it at least not at the Rt 20 / Rt 3 location.
Time for honest people to be on the “Board”


Advertisement